Get What's Yours
  • Updates
  • About the Authors
    • Laurence Kotlikoff
    • Philip Moeller
    • Paul Solman
  • Newsletters
  • Media
  • Videos
  • Contact

New GAO Study Confirms That Social Security Staff Are Routinely Making Mistakes

October, 2016Larry KotlikoffNewsletter1 comment

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) just released a report that confirmed what anyone who knows anything about Social Security already knows (which, apparently, does not include Social Security’s Commissioner) — Social Security’s staff are routinely making major mistakes in advising people about their Social Security benefits — mistakes that are costing people potentially tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

To quote a part of the report,

The GAO observed 30 in-person claims at SSA field offices and found that claimants were not consistently provided key information that people may need to make well-informed decisions. For example, in 8 of 26 claims interviews in which the claimant could have received higher monthly benefits by waiting until a later age, the claims specialist did not discuss the advantages and disadvantages of delaying claiming. Further, only 7 of the 18 claimants for whom the retirement earnings test could potentially apply were given complete information about how the test worked. SSA’s Program Operations Manual System (POMS) states that claims specialists should explain the advantages and disadvantages of filing an application so that the individual can make an informed filing decision. The problems we observed during the claims interviews occurred in part because the questions included in the claims process did not specifically cover some key information.

This is a strong criticism, but it doesn’t begin to suggest the magnitude of Social Security’s mistakes. Here’s an example. It’s the case of a gentleman named Andrew Bronny who used my company’s Maximize My Social Security software to figure out how to maximize his household’s lifetime benefits. The software correctly told him that his wife could file just for a full spousal benefits (half of Andrew’s full retirement benefit) when she turned 66 in November because she turned 62 before January 2, 2016. But here’s what Andrew just wrote me. I get emails like this almost every day.

I just off the phone w SS. They called me. This was the five day-after receiving the online application-phone call to verify our marriage and intent to file a restrictive application for spousal benefits. The agent advised me that I had done everything right in my approved file & suspend application last year, but that spousal benefits were not available as my spouse was not,

“66 April 30, 2016″. I stated that she was 62 or older at the end of 2015, will reach FRA November, 2016, and is eligible for spousal benefits as per the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. I asked to speak with her supervisor.

After a 3 minute delay the same agent was back on the phone and stated that I was absolutely correct, (“These rules change daily”) and that benefits would be confirmed in a mailing.

Wow!

There is still a huge disconnect within SSA. The rules don’t change daily. The information supplied to the agents, or agents’ interpretations, has probably cost huge numbers of applicants denial of legal benefits. As you have stated, the rules are complex. Complex indeed. Woe to the unsophisticated applicant. Thank you for making me sophisticated.

Andrew is on target. In his case, the agent based her initial response on highly misleading to the point of being wrong instructions issued by Social Security about the new law passed last November. It took Social Security till mid February (coincidentally within a day of a conference call I had with some of their top officials pointing out precisely the mistake that almost snared Andrew) to send its staff revised instructions. Even the new instructions were hard to follow.

Larry Kotlikoff
Laurence Kotlikoff is a William Fairfield Warren Professor at Boston University, a Professor of Economics at Boston University, a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a Fellow of the Econometric Society, a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, President of Economic Security Planning, Inc., a company specializing in financial planning software, and the Director of the Fiscal Analysis Center.
Previous post How an Annulment May Affect Social Security Benefits Next post Cutting Your Social Security Benefits, Republican Style

1 comment. Leave new

Shivam Sahu
January, 2018 4:13 pm

Hi Larry,

I just loved this article! As a former high school teacher, I know well the study mistakes students make – esp. studying what you already know.

Every time I mentioned this mistake to a student and/or parent it was like an epiphany. Oh, and telling students about this study mistake needs to be done individually. Students who make this mistake don’t hear the suggestion when told to the entire class.

I always suggested that students list what they know (yes, handwrite the list!), put a check by it (give credit to yourself which gives confidence), and then move on!

Reply

Leave a Reply to Shivam Sahu Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Order the Book

IndieBound
Bamm
BN
amazon

NY Times Bestseller!

9781501144769_Get What's Yours (2)
All of the new Social Security rule changes are covered in detail in this new edition of Get What’s Yours, on sale in May and available now for pre-order. Get What’s Yours quickly established itself as the definitive guide to Social Security when published in 2015. It jumped to the top of The New York Times bestseller lists and became the nation’s top-selling business book of the year.

Buy It Now!

Home
Back to Medicare

 

Follow Us on Twitter

Follow @Kotlikoff
Follow @paulsolman
Follow @PhilMoeller

Purchase The Book

IndieBound
Bamm
BN
amazon

Sign up for Our Newsletter

Stay informed with our newsletter!
  • Newsletters
  • Contact
  • Laurence Kotlikoff
  • Media
  • Paul Solman
  • Philip Moeller
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
© 2016 Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Philip Moeller, Paul Solman